Review the lab findings and decide if the diagnosis is

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

  1. Review the lab findings and decide if the diagnosis is Type 2 or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
  2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with your chosen diagnosis
  3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.
  4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

  1. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.
  2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.
  3. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.
  4. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations

  • FNP_NR507_Week6_Case_Study_Template.docx

  • caseScenerio.docx

Week 6 Case Study Template

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

1. Based on the review of the history, physical and lab findings what is the most likely diabetes diagnosis for this patient?

2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with the chosen diabetes diagnosis.

3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

1. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.

2. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.

3. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

4. Identify two (2) “ Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.

References

[Must be on a separate page and in APA format]

,

Preparing the Assignment

Requirements

Content Criteria

1. Read the case study listed below.

2. Refer to the rubric for grading requirements.

3. Utilizing the  Week 6 Case Study TemplateLinks to an external site. , provide your responses to the case study questions listed below.

4. You must use at least one scholarly reference to provide pathophysiology statements. For this class, use of the textbook for pathophysiology statements is acceptable. You may also use an appropriate evidence-based journal.

5. You must use the current Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes -Abridged for Primary Care Providers provided by the American Diabetes Association to determine the patient's type of diabetes and answer the treatment recommendation questions. The most current guideline can be found at the following web address:  https://professional.diabetes.org/content-page/practice-guidelines-resourcesLinks to an external site.  At the website, locate the current year’s CPG for use. 

6. Proper APA format (in-text citations, reference page, spelling, English language, and grammar) must be used.

Case Study Scenario

Chief Complaint

J.T. is a 48-year old male who presents to the primary care clinic with fatigue, weight loss, and extreme thirst and increased appetite.

History of Present Illness

J.T. has been in his usual state of health until three weeks ago when he began experiencing symptoms of fatigue, weight loss, and extreme thirst. He reports that he would like to begin a walking program, but he feels too fatigued to walk at any point during the day. Now he is very concerned about gaining more weight since he is eating more. He reports insomnia due to having to get up and urinate greater than 4 times per night.

Past Medical History 

· Hypertension

· Hyperlipidemia

· Obesity

Family History

· Both parents deceased

· Brother: Type 2 diabetes 

Social History

· Denies smoking

· Denies alcohol or recreational drug use

· Landscaper  

Allergies

· No Known Drug Allergies 

Medications

· Lisinopril 20 mg once daily by mouth

· Atorvastatin 20 mg once daily by mouth

· Aspirin 81 mg once daily by mouth

· Multivitamin once daily by mouth

Review of Systems

· Constitutional: – fever, – chills, – weight loss.

· Neurological: denies dizziness or disorientation

· HEENT: Denies nasal congestion, rhinorrhea or sore throat.  

· Chest: (-)Tachypnea. Denies cough.

· Heart: Denies chest pain, chest pressure or palpitations.

· Lymph: Denies lymph node swelling.

General Physical Exam  

· Constitutional: Alert and oriented male in no acute distress   

· Vital Signs: BP-136/80, T-98.6 F, P-78, RR-20

· Wt. 240 lbs., Ht. 5'8″, BMI 36.5

HEENT 

· Eyes: Pupils equal, round and reactive to light and accommodation, normal conjunctiva. 

· Ears: Tympanic membranes intact. 

· Nose: Bilateral nasal turbinates without redness or swelling. Nares patent. 

· Mouth: Oropharynx clear. No mouth lesions. Teeth present and intact; Oral mucous membranes and lips dry. 

Neck/Lymph Nodes 

· Neck supple without JVD. 

· No lymphadenopathy, masses or carotid bruits. 

Lungs 

· Bilateral breath sounds clear throughout lung fields. Breathing quality deep with fruity breath odor

Heart 

· S1 and S2 regular rate and rhythm; – tachycardia; no rubs or murmurs. 

Integumentary System 

· Skin warm, dry; Nail beds pink without clubbing.  

Labs

Test

Patient's Result

Reference

Glucose (fasting)

132

60-120 mg/dL

BUN

20

7-24 mg/dL

Creatinine

0.8

0.7-1.4 mg/dL

Sodium

141

135-145 mEq/L

Sodium

141

135-145 mEq/L

Chloride

97

95-105 mEq/L

HCO3

24

22-28 mEq/L

A1C

7.2

Urinalysis

Protein

Glucose

Ketones

 

Negative

Positive

Negative

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

220 mg/dL

J.T. is diagnosed with diabetes. Review all information provided in the case to answer the following questions.

Case Study Questions

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

1. Review the lab findings and decide if the diagnosis is Type 2 or Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

2. Explain the pathophysiology associated with your chosen diagnosis

3. Identify at least three subjective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

4. Identify at least three objective findings from the case which support the chosen diagnosis.

Management of the Disease

*Utilize the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support your treatment recommendations.

1. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of this condition and provide an example (drug name) for each.

2. Describe the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

3. Identify two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for this patient.

4. Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category

Points

%

Description

Pathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

45

45%

The student:

· Identifies the likely diagnosis based on exam and lab findings. 

· Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen disorder.

· Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only).

· Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case.

· Identifies at least three objective findings from the case.

(5 Required Elements)

Management of the Disease 

45

45%

The student:

· Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.

· Identifies two (2)“Evidence A” recommendedmedicationclassesfor the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each.

· Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for the condition.

· Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above.

(4 Required Elements)

90

90%

Total CONTENT Points = 90 pts

NR507 Week 6 Diabetes Case Study

NR507 Week 6 Diabetes Case Study

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePathophysiology & Clinical Findings of the Disease

The student:  – Identifies the correct type of diabetes  – Explains the pathophysiology associated with the chosen disorder.  – Supports the pathophysiology statement with at least one appropriate, scholarly reference (textbook is acceptable for pathophysiology statements only).  – Identifies at least three subjective findings from the case.  – Identifies at least three objective findings from the case.  (5 Required Elements)

45 pts

All 5 required elements are present.

41 pts

1 required element is missing.

37 pts

2 required elements are missing

23 pts

3-4 required elements are missing.

0 pts

All 5 required elements are missing.

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeManagement of the Disease

The student:  – Utilizes the required Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to support the chosen treatment recommendations.  – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended medication classes for the treatment of the condition and provides an example (drug name) for each.  – Identifies two (2) “Evidence A” recommended non-pharmacological treatment options for the condition.  – Describes the mechanism of action for each of the medication classes identified above  (4 Required Elements)

45 pts

All 4 elements are present

41 pts

1 required element is missing

37 pts

2 required elements are missing

23 pts

3 required elements are missing

0 pts

All 4 required elements are missing

45 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization, spelling, grammar & APA format

The student:  – Uses the week 6 case study template for case study responses.  – Provides correct in-text citations for responses which match the reference page.  – Has minimal spelling, grammar & APA format errors.

10 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 0-2 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

9 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 3-5 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

8 pts

Case study template is used for responses AND In-text citations are correct which match the reference page AND There are 6-8 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

5 pts

Case study template is not used for responses OR In-text citations are incorrect or do not match the reference page AND There are 0-5 errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

0 pts

Case study template is not used for responses AND/OR In-text citations are incorrect or do not match the reference page AND There are 6 or more errors in spelling, grammar or APA format.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

QUALITY: 100% ORIGINAL PAPER NO ChatGPT.NO PLAGIARISMCUSTOM PAPER

Best Custom Essay Writing Services

Looking for unparalleled custom paper writing services? Our team of experienced professionals at AcademicWritersBay.com is here to provide you with top-notch assistance that caters to your unique needs.

We understand the importance of producing original, high-quality papers that reflect your personal voice and meet the rigorous standards of academia. That’s why we assure you that our work is completely plagiarism-free—we craft bespoke solutions tailored exclusively for you.

Why Choose AcademicWritersBay.com?

  • Our papers are 100% original, custom-written from scratch.
  • We’re here to support you around the clock, any day of the year.
  • You’ll find our prices competitive and reasonable.
  • We handle papers across all subjects, regardless of urgency or difficulty.
  • Need a paper urgently? We can deliver within 6 hours!
  • Relax with our on-time delivery commitment.
  • We offer money-back and privacy guarantees to ensure your satisfaction and confidentiality.
  • Benefit from unlimited amendments upon request to get the paper you envisioned.
  • We pledge our dedication to meeting your expectations and achieving the grade you deserve.

Our Process: Getting started with us is as simple as can be. Here’s how to do it:

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top or the “Order Now” button at the bottom. You’ll be directed to our order form.
  • Provide the specifics of your paper in the “PAPER DETAILS” section.
  • Select your academic level, the deadline, and the required number of pages.
  • Click on “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to provide your registration details, then “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT.”
  • Follow the simple payment instructions and soon, our writers will be hard at work on your paper.

AcademicWritersBay.com is dedicated to expediting the writing process without compromising on quality. Our roster of writers boasts individuals with advanced degrees—Masters and PhDs—in a myriad of disciplines, ensuring that no matter the complexity or field of your assignment, we have the expertise to tackle it with finesse. Our quick turnover doesn’t mean rushed work; it means efficiency and priority handling, ensuring your deadlines are met with the excellence your academics demand.

ORDER NOW and experience the difference with AcademicWritersBay.com, where excellence meets timely delivery.

NO PLAGIARISM
error: Content is protected !!